WebTHE GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. v. WITHAM. November 6, 1873. [16] Contract—Consideration—Acceptance of Tender. The plaintiffs advertised for tenders for the supply of stores for a period of twelve months. The defendant sent in a tender to … The case mainly relied on in support of that contention was Burton v. Great Northern … WebApr 21, 2012 · Great Northern Railway Co v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16, and Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256, referred to. 5 An agreement to do an act which the promisor is under an existing obligation to a third party to do may amount to valid consideration; the promisee obtains the benefit of a direct obligation which he can …
Agyei AND Another v FORI AND Others - Law of Tort - Studocu
WebIn Great Northern Railway Co v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16, Poole 58 the court suggested that revocation could occur before a person completed an action they had undertaken. The court used the example that if someone … WebGreat Northern Railway Company v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16. ... "I hereby undertake to supply the Great Northern Railway Company, for twelve months from the 1st of November 1871, to 31st October 1872, with such quantities of each or any of the several articles named in the attached specification as the company's store-keeper may order from time ... cincinnati realty listings
II - 1 AGREEMENT (OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE) Flashcards Quizlet
WebGreat Northern Railway Co v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16. Where the offer takes the form of an option (for example where there is consideration to keep the offer open) then the offer cannot be terminated before the time of the option has expired. Goldsborough Mort v Quinn (1910) 10 CLR 674. Webas the court suggested in Great Northern Railway Cov Witham (1873), to pay some-one £100 to walk from London to York. What makes these situations unilateral contracts is … WebSep 28, 2015 · GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY V. WITHAM [1873] LR 9 CP 16 Court of Common Pleas (England) – 6 November 1873 FACTS Great Northern … cincinnati records office